The Wolfman

This is the room for discussing books, magazines, periodicals and media related to Bizarre Magic.

The Wolfman

Postby davidparr on Thu Feb 18, 2010 11:57 pm

The 1941 movie The Wolf Man had such a profound influence on my pliable childhood mind, I knew I had to see the recently released remake. Having followed the troubled production history of the new version, I braced myself for the worst.

I was pleasantly surprised by how much I enjoyed the The Wolfman. I didn't love it. But I liked it a lot. The cast did a very good job, there are plenty of homages to werewolf movies of the past, and the production design is topnotch. There was a moment during one of the transformation scenes when I thought: Man, if I had seen this when I was twelve, this would have been my favorite movie — and I wouldn't have been able to sleep for a week! It was like seeing a long-lost Hammer film from days gone by, the kind of stuff that's gleefully over the top but works because it takes place in its own little pocket universe — like a fable. And in this case, the Big Bad Wolf will take off your limbs with the just one flick of his claw. Doink! and there goes your head.

Several additional thoughts. The approach to filming this was not one of hiding the monster in the shadows. On the contrary, the monster is depicted almost as if it were a superhero. The viewer is given full opportunity to see every tooth and muscle on the creature, to appreciate the monster's enormity and power. It's meant to instill awe, not lurking dread. Also, the reviews seem disconnected from the movie I saw. The reviews I'd read conveyed the impression that the movie is a jumbled mess. It isn't. Would I have liked to have seen more time devoted character development? Yes, but I doubt the studio would have allowed the movie to be longer than it is. Maybe we'll see more on video. And there's certainly not less character development here than there was in the original version. A couple of plot points are dropped or left unexplored, but the movie is not incoherent. Many of the reviews criticized Anthony Hopkins for hamming it up, but I thought his work was actually rather restrained, and the reviews also dismissed Emily Blunt's performance as being flat and uninteresting, which is not the case. It would have been nice for her — and Geraldine Chaplin — to have had more screen time, but no one in this movie was miscast and there isn't a bad or halfass performance in the lot. Wish I could say the same of Coppola's remake of Dracula. Keanu Reeves? Winona Ryder? WTF?

Of course some of us will always wonder what might have been if the studio hadn't interfered and the director hadn't walked, but this is the movie we've got and it's a good time at the picture show, clearly aimed at fans of the genre. Go see it.
User avatar
davidparr
Pastor of Muppets
 
Posts: 1274
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 4:07 am
Location: Chicago

Re: The Wolfman

Postby Egregor on Sun Feb 21, 2010 8:37 pm

Given my difficulties in going to the theatre, would you recommend seeing this on big screen, or will I be just as happy waiting for DVD. Some movies just have to be appreciated on the big screen.
Stop laughing, I'm serious.
User avatar
Egregor
Fiend
 
Posts: 2673
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 8:06 pm
Location: Harrisburg PA

Re: The Wolfman

Postby davidparr on Sun Feb 21, 2010 11:47 pm

E, given the hassle and cost, I'd recommend you wait for video. It's not a great film. It's a good one, which is quite surprising considering the messiness of its production history. You'll have just as much fun watching it while eating a mushroom pizza at home.
User avatar
davidparr
Pastor of Muppets
 
Posts: 1274
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 4:07 am
Location: Chicago

Re: The Wolfman

Postby Joe Diamond on Tue Mar 02, 2010 4:41 pm

I saw it in the theatre last nite.

Like David, I have a childhood love of this movie, and all the Universal Monsters. However, Wolfman is still my favorite.

I've had many childhood memories pissed on lately. The 4th Indiana Jones Movie, Transformers 2, and I didn't even bother seeing GI Joe. I loved all these as a kid, now I can barely look at any of them.

Sherlock Holmes was able to resist crushing my childhood love, as did this movie. It was fun, and I liked it. Sure, the directing is crap, and you can tell that beneath some of the mess is a great movie. However, it's still a great tribute for those of us who love the genre!
User avatar
Joe Diamond
Insaniac
 
Posts: 273
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2008 3:27 pm
Location: Between Crystal Lake & Neverland

Re: The Wolfman

Postby Mystician on Sat May 01, 2010 9:15 pm

Ah, the ol' Universal monster movies. Good times.
When I was a kid, I watched "Dr. Shock" every Saturday afternoon, followed by "Creature Double Feature", which featured '50's schlocky mutant horror films. (Dr. Shock was Philadelphia area only, and showed the classic monster movies)

My nickname among friends in school during 7th grade was -I shit thee not- "Boris".
mauahahaaa.. yeah, some rep, I know..
Qualis vir, talis oratio !
User avatar
Mystician
Mage
 
Posts: 1823
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 7:48 pm
Location: Everywhere, Nowhere

Re: The Wolfman

Postby Diedrich on Sat May 22, 2010 10:22 am

David, I too enjoyed this movie. Nice approach I thought, the rivalvy between father and son. Great cinamatography and period dress. You summed it up ver well.

Diedrich
Diedrich
 
Posts: 219
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 9:19 am


Return to Library

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest